Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marble

474 N.E.2d 333, 15 Ohio St. 3d 394, 15 Ohio B. 509, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1310
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1984·No. D.D. No. 84-34·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and a review of the record in this case, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent’s actions, when considered altogether, necessitate that sanctions against him be imposed.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marble, 474 N.E.2d 333, 15 Ohio St. 3d 394, 15 Ohio B. 509, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1310 (Ohio 1984).

474 N.E.2d 333 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bar Ass'n v. Kless
476 N.E.2d 1035 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)