Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin

2021 Ohio 3195, 178 N.E.3d 547, 165 Ohio St. 3d 1250

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 2021

Docket2020-0469

StatusPublished

This text of 2021 Ohio 3195 (Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, 2021 Ohio 3195, 178 N.E.3d 547, 165 Ohio St. 3d 1250 (Ohio 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MAHIN. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.] (No. 2020-0469—Submitted September 15, 2021—Decided September 16, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Edward Mahin, Attorney Registration No. 0011253, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 19, 2020, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, with second year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, 160 Ohio St.3d 424, 2020-Ohio-4098, 157 N.E.3d 750. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MAHIN. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.] (No. 2020-0469—Submitted September 15, 2021—Decided September 16, 2021.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Edward Mahin, Attorney Registration No. 0011253, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 19, 2020, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, with second year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, 160 Ohio St.3d 424, 2020-Ohio-4098, 157 N.E.3d 750. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2021 Ohio 3195, 178 N.E.3d 547, 165 Ohio St. 3d 1250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-mahin-ohio-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack