Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange

564 N.E.2d 1069, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1991
DocketNo. 90-884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 564 N.E.2d 1069 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange, 564 N.E.2d 1069, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17 (Ohio 1991).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cox
786 N.E.2d 454 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Lange
1995 Ohio 332 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 N.E.2d 1069, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-lange-ohio-1991.