Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange

564 N.E.2d 1069, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 1991·No. No. 90-884·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange, 564 N.E.2d 1069, 57 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 17 (Ohio 1991).

564 N.E.2d 1069 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cox
786 N.E.2d 454 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Lange
1995 Ohio 332 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)