Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Hennekes

894 N.E.2d 322, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1224
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 17, 2008
DocketNo. 2006-0394
StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 322 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Hennekes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Hennekes, 894 N.E.2d 322, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Jason R. Hennekes, Attorney Registration No. 0075744, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

[1225]*1225{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 2, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hennekes, 110 Ohio St.3d 108, 2006-Ohio-3669, 850 N.E.2d 1201.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Hennekes
850 N.E.2d 1201 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 N.E.2d 322, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-hennekes-ohio-2008.