Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Freedman

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Freedman

551 N.E.2d 143, 49 Ohio St. 3d 65, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 60
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1237
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 551 N.E.2d 143 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Freedman, 551 N.E.2d 143, 49 Ohio St. 3d 65, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 60 (Ohio 1990).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Respondent intended to, and for a short time did, thwart the administration of justice. He obtained and kept contraband which he knew the federal authorities, armed with a search warrant, sought. This is a [67]*67serious crime. Therefore, we agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, but order that respondent be permanently disbarred. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cohen
32 N.E.3d 455 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Young
807 N.E.2d 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 N.E.2d 143, 49 Ohio St. 3d 65, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-freedman-ohio-1990.