Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Florez
Opinion
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael G. Florez, Attorney Registration No. 0010693, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 16, 2003, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 98 Ohio St.3d 448, 2003-Ohio-1730, 786 N.E.2d 875.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2003 Ohio 7291 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Florez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.