Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz

597 N.E.2d 79, 64 Ohio St. 3d 452, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1890
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 2, 1992·No. No. 92-417·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz, 597 N.E.2d 79, 64 Ohio St. 3d 452, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1890 (Ohio 1992).

597 N.E.2d 79 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Begovic (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4531 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Axner
2013 Ohio 400 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sershion
2010 Ohio 3803 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
2000 Ohio 219 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
732 N.E.2d 985 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Culbreath
2000 Ohio 336 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell
1998 Ohio 237 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schwartz
1996 Ohio 290 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)