Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel

449 N.E.2d 456, 5 Ohio St. 3d 145, 5 Ohio B. 277, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 727
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 1983·No. D.D. No. 83-11·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel, 449 N.E.2d 456, 5 Ohio St. 3d 145, 5 Ohio B. 277, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 727 (Ohio 1983).

449 N.E.2d 456 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
618 N.E.2d 159 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
1993 Ohio 6 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross
478 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Walsh
456 N.E.2d 1206 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)