Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel
449 N.E.2d 456, 5 Ohio St. 3d 145, 5 Ohio B. 277, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 727
Opinion
After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).
It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel, 449 N.E.2d 456, 5 Ohio St. 3d 145, 5 Ohio B. 277, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 727 (Ohio 1983).
449 N.E.2d 456 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
618 N.E.2d 159 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
1993 Ohio 6 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross
478 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Walsh
456 N.E.2d 1206 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)