Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis

2014 Ohio 3, 3 N.E.3d 1202, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1218
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 3, 2014·No. 2012-0687·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael William Davis, Attorney Registration No. 0016994, last known business address in Fort Thomas, Kentucky.

*1219 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of October 30, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on the condition that respondent commit no further misconduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis, 2014 Ohio 3, 3 N.E.3d 1202, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1218 (Ohio 2014).

2014 Ohio 3 (Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.