Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Clark

659 N.E.2d 797, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1505
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1996·No. 94-497·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas H. Clark.

The court coming now to consider its order of December 14, 1994, suspending respondent, Thomas H. Clark, Attorney Registration No. 0009206, last known address in Cincinnati, Ohio, from the practice of law in Ohio for two years with one year suspended, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Thomas H. Clark be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio, effective January 22, 1996.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov. Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clark (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 145, 642 N.E.2d 611.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Clark, 659 N.E.2d 797, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 1996).

659 N.E.2d 797 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.