Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Buckley

98 Ohio St. 3d 1218
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 2003
DocketNo. 2001-1877
StatusPublished

This text of 98 Ohio St. 3d 1218 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Buckley, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1218 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Dennis J. Buckley, Attorney Registration No. 0030863, last known business address in Covington, Kentucky.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of February 20, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the second year stayed upon conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Dennis J. Buckley be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Buckley (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 333, 763 N.E.2d 116.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Buckley
763 N.E.2d 116 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 Ohio St. 3d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-buckley-ohio-2003.