Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bailey
This text of 862 N.E.2d 111 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On September 6, 2006, this court issued an order finding that respondent had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, enjoined him from actions constituting the unauthorized practice of law, imposed a civil penalty in the amount of $50,000, and ordered respondent to pay board costs in the amount of $4,218.13. On January 26, 2007, respondent filed a motion for stay of judgment. Relator filed a memo opposing the motion. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that respondent’s motion for stay of judgment is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
862 N.E.2d 111, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-bailey-ohio-2007.