Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Alsfelder

947 N.E.2d 177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1495
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 2011
Docket2011-0625
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 947 N.E.2d 177 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Alsfelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Alsfelder, 947 N.E.2d 177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

This matter is before the court upon the filing by movant, Cincinnati Bar Association, of a motion to hold respondent in contempt for failure to obey a subpoena duces tecum by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline requiring him to appear at a deposition and to produce certain documents by December 1, 2010.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the motion is granted. Respondent, Robert F. Alsfelder, Attorney Registration No. 0014829, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio, is found in contempt and ordered to comply with the subpoena duces tecum and orders issued by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Alsfelder
2014 Ohio 870 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
947 N.E.2d 177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-alsfelder-ohio-2011.