Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.

700 N.E.2d 617, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3561
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Ohio St. 3d 385
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 1998·No. 98-664·Published

Opinion

On April 7, 1998, movant filed a motion to show cause why respondent should not be punished for contempt for failure or refusal, without just cause or just excuse, to obey the commands of the court to appear in response to the subpoena duces tecum issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and to produce the documents the production of which was ordered by the subpoena duces tecum.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law be granted leave to intervene.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sica sponte, that the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law file an amicus brief, discussing the issues raised in the motion, within twenty days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp., 700 N.E.2d 617, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3561 (Ohio 1998).

700 N.E.2d 617 (Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.