Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co.

123 F. 479, 59 C.C.A. 58, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4026
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1903
DocketNo. 169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 F. 479 (Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co., 123 F. 479, 59 C.C.A. 58, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4026 (2d Cir. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record shows that this case as now presented upon an appeal from a final decree awarding an injunction does not differ in any particulars favorable to the appellant from the case as it was presented to this court upon an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction. 115 Fed. 507, 53 C. C. A. 161. All the questions involved having been previously determined by this court adversely to the appellant, we think it would be unseemly to review them when the court is constituted by different judges, and that the decree should be affirmed upon the authority of that decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co.
145 F. 933 (Second Circuit, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F. 479, 59 C.C.A. 58, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cimiotti-unhairing-co-v-nearseal-unhairing-co-ca2-1903.