Cimarron Federal Savings Association v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Cimarron Federal Savings Association v. Jones

1992 OK 55, 832 P.2d 420, 63 O.B.A.J. 1356, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 78

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 30, 1992

DocketNo. 75028

StatusPublished

This text of 1992 OK 55 (Cimarron Federal Savings Association v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cimarron Federal Savings Association v. Jones, 1992 OK 55, 832 P.2d 420, 63 O.B.A.J. 1356, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 78 (Okla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Certiorari having been granted previously in the above-styled case, we adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 832 P.2d 426, as amended hereby, and give it prece-dential effect and release same for publication by Order of this Court.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division I, in the above-styled cause is in irreconcilable conflict with Core v. Nave, 773 P.2d 767 (Okla.App.1989) and Core v. Nave is overruled insofar as it is in conflict with the above-styled case. Further, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is corrected, at page 5, to reflect the citation of “Zehr v. May, 67 Okl. 97, 169 P. 1077 (1917)” rather than “Kehr v. May” as shown in the opinion.

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, V.C.J., LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. KAUGER, J., concurs in result. Dissents to Substitution of one court of appeals opinion for another. ALMA WILSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Certiorari having been granted previously in the above-styled case, we adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 832 P.2d 426, as amended hereby, and give it prece-dential effect and release same for publication by Order of this Court.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division I, in the above-styled cause is in irreconcilable conflict with Core v. Nave, 773 P.2d 767 (Okla.App.1989) and Core v. Nave is overruled insofar as it is in conflict with the above-styled case. Further, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is corrected, at page 5, to reflect the citation of “Zehr v. May, 67 Okl. 97, 169 P. 1077 (1917)” rather than “Kehr v. May” as shown in the opinion.

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, V.C.J., LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. KAUGER, J., concurs in result. Dissents to Substitution of one court of appeals opinion for another. ALMA WILSON, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1992 OK 55, 832 P.2d 420, 63 O.B.A.J. 1356, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cimarron-federal-savings-association-v-jones-okla-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack