Cilento v. Cilento
225 A.D.2d 648, 639 N.Y.2d 936, 639 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2621
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The determination of the Supreme Court was not improper (see, Hughes v Hughes, 224 AD2d 389). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cilento v. Cilento, 225 A.D.2d 648, 639 N.Y.2d 936, 639 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 648 (Cilento v. Cilento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rupp-Elmasri v. Elmasri
8 A.D.3d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Pascarelli v. Pascarelli
283 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Palumbo v. Palumbo
273 A.D.2d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Bungay v. Morin
256 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Colangelo v. Colangelo
176 Misc. 2d 837 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Pastarnack v. Pastarnack
248 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)