Cilatman v. State

9 Ga. App. 817
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 10, 1911·No. 3388·Published

Opinion

Powell, ,T.

This case is controlled by Strickland v. State, 137 Ga. 1 (72 S. E. 260). Judgment affirmed.

R. N. Holtzclaw, for plaintiff in error. Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cilatman v. State, 9 Ga. App. 817 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

9 Ga. App. 817 (Cilatman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. State
72 S.E. 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)