Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Cilatman v. State

Cilatman v. State

9 Ga. App. 817
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 10, 1911
Docket3388
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ga. App. 817 (Cilatman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cilatman v. State, 9 Ga. App. 817 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, ,T.

This case is controlled by Strickland v. State, 137 Ga. 1 (72 S. E. 260). Judgment affirmed.

R. N. Holtzclaw, for plaintiff in error. Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. State
72 S.E. 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Ga. App. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cilatman-v-state-gactapp-1911.