Cikora v. State
450 So. 2d 351, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 1984·No. Nos. 83-1341, 83-1357·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cikora v. State, 450 So. 2d 351, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
450 So. 2d 351 (Cikora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cikora v. Wainwright
661 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Florida, 1987)
Albritton v. State
458 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)