Ciggio v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciggio v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

150 N.Y.S. 150

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.Y.S. 150 (Ciggio v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciggio v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., 150 N.Y.S. 150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant. The evidence is meager and insufficient to establish a cause of action. Plaintiff proved that he was directed by his “boss” to dump a box, and that while engaged in that act his finger was caught and injured. The alleged negligence of the defendant seems to have been left entirely to conjecture; certainly it was not proved.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs in this court and in the court below. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant. The evidence is meager and insufficient to establish a cause of action. Plaintiff proved that he was directed by his “boss” to dump a box, and that while engaged in that act his finger was caught and injured. The alleged negligence of the defendant seems to have been left entirely to conjecture; certainly it was not proved.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs in this court and in the court below. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.Y.S. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciggio-v-rodgers-hagerty-inc-nyappterm-1914.