Ciffo v. Fireman'S Fund Ins. ComPany

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ciffo v. Fireman'S Fund Ins. ComPany

560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2420, 1990 WL 41509

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1990

DocketNo. 88-0483

StatusPublished

This text of 560 So. 2d 265 (Ciffo v. Fireman'S Fund Ins. ComPany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciffo v. Fireman'S Fund Ins. ComPany, 560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2420, 1990 WL 41509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse a judgment entered on renewed defense motions for directed verdict based upon the two year statute of limitations for professional malpractice. In Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc., 531 So.2d 84 (Fla.1988), decided after the trial court ruling here, it was determined that an insurance agent is not a professional for the purposes of the statute. We cannot discern from this limited record whether the trial court considered the other post judgment motions mooted by its ruling. Therefore, upon remand, prior to entering an order reinstating the verdict, the trial court shall reconsider the defendants’ pending motions for new trial and to apply set off. We do not address these issues.

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse a judgment entered on renewed defense motions for directed verdict based upon the two year statute of limitations for professional malpractice. In Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc., 531 So.2d 84 (Fla.1988), decided after the trial court ruling here, it was determined that an insurance agent is not a professional for the purposes of the statute. We cannot discern from this limited record whether the trial court considered the other post judgment motions mooted by its ruling. Therefore, upon remand, prior to entering an order reinstating the verdict, the trial court shall reconsider the defendants’ pending motions for new trial and to apply set off. We do not address these issues.

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 So. 2d 265, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2420, 1990 WL 41509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciffo-v-firemans-fund-ins-company-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack