Cieri v. Dodge

Second Circuit

Cieri v. Dodge

86 F.2d 259, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3709

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 16, 1936·No. No. 92·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For tlie reasons stated at the argument this order must be affirmed. The case did not raise the question of the effect of the discharge upon the appellant’s judgment and the district court should not have discussed it. It is impossible to reverse an opinion, but we take this occasion to declare that it was extrajudicial, and that it should not be regarded as authoritative for any purpose whatever.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For tlie reasons stated at the argument this order must be affirmed. The case did not raise the question of the effect of the discharge upon the appellant’s judgment and the district court should not have discussed it. It is impossible to reverse an opinion, but we take this occasion to declare that it was extrajudicial, and that it should not be regarded as authoritative for any purpose whatever.

Order affirmed.

Cieri v. Dodge, 86 F.2d 259, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3709 (2d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

86 F.2d 259 (Cieri v. Dodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related