Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC
Opinion
Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CIENA CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
OYSTER OPTICS, LLC, Appellee
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2019-2117 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00070. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH PALYS, ANDERSON TO. Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 08/04/2020
WAYNE MICHAEL HELGE, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellee. Also rep- resented by JAMES THOMAS WILSON, ALDO NOTO.
MOLLY R. SILFEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for interve- nor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 4, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC (Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.