Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC
Opinion
Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
CIENA CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
OYSTER OPTICS, LLC,
Appellee
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
2019-2117
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00070.
JUDGMENT
IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington , DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH PALYS, ANDERSON TO.
Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 08/04/2020
WAYNE MICHAEL HELGE, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES THOMAS WILSON, ALDO NOTO.
MOLLY R. SILFEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor . Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 4, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC (Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.