Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 F.3d 1157
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 4, 2020·No. 19-2117·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2020

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CIENA CORPORATION, Appellant

v.

OYSTER OPTICS, LLC, Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2019-2117 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00070. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH PALYS, ANDERSON TO. Case: 19-2117 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 08/04/2020

WAYNE MICHAEL HELGE, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellee. Also rep- resented by JAMES THOMAS WILSON, ALDO NOTO.

MOLLY R. SILFEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for interve- nor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 4, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2020).

Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC (Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.