Cicio v. Cicio

109 A.D.2d 813, 486 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47321
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Stolarik, J.), dated June 29,1984, as awarded her only $40 per week for temporary maintenance and $50 per week for child support.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the parties’ respective financial conditions and the immediate financial needs of plaintiff, the award was adequate (Rossman v Rossman, 91 AD2d 1036). Moreover, the proper remedy for inequities in an order of support pendente lite is a speedy trial (see, Chachkes v Chachkes, 107 AD2d 786; Rossman v Rossman, supra). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cicio v. Cicio, 109 A.D.2d 813, 486 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

109 A.D.2d 813 (Cicio v. Cicio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scagnelli v. Scagnelli
127 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Gross v. Gross
114 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)