Cichanosky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cichanosky v. State

60 S.W.2d 1113, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 747

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 10, 1933

DocketNo. 16045

StatusPublished

This text of 60 S.W.2d 1113 (Cichanosky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cichanosky v. State, 60 S.W.2d 1113, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 747 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Robbery is the offense; " penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twenty-five years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. No irregularities have been found or perceived in the record. There are no complaints of the rulings of the court by bills of exception or otherwise. The evidence heard in the trial, court is not brought up for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Robbery is the offense; " penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twenty-five years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. No irregularities have been found or perceived in the record. There are no complaints of the rulings of the court by bills of exception or otherwise. The evidence heard in the trial, court is not brought up for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 S.W.2d 1113, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cichanosky-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.