Ciccone v. Ciccone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ciccone v. Ciccone

509 So. 2d 987, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9328

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 1987·No. No. 87-549·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the Order Regarding Temporary Relief from which this appeal is taken. However, our affirmance of such order recognizes its temporary nature and is not to be taken as an indication that the relief granted therein to the appellant-wife would be appropriate on a final disposition of this matter. We remind the trial court that, at the final hearing, which, we hope, will occur without undue delay, the husband’s assets as well as income are to be taken into account in fixing his obligations to pay alimony and child support. See Wright v. Wright, 507 So.2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the Order Regarding Temporary Relief from which this appeal is taken. However, our affirmance of such order recognizes its temporary nature and is not to be taken as an indication that the relief granted therein to the appellant-wife would be appropriate on a final disposition of this matter. We remind the trial court that, at the final hearing, which, we hope, will occur without undue delay, the husband’s assets as well as income are to be taken into account in fixing his obligations to pay alimony and child support. See Wright v. Wright, 507 So.2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Ciccone v. Ciccone, 509 So. 2d 987, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1707, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

509 So. 2d 987 (Ciccone v. Ciccone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related