Cicchino v. Ferrando
This text of 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324 (Cicchino v. Ferrando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carmine Cicchino brought this action in term, a judgment rendered, and to enjoin its collection. After full hearing the court vacated the judgment and granted the injunction. Ferrando appealed and the Court of Appeals held:
1. The question is raised in this court whether or not an action of this nature is appealable.
2. This is not an ordinary civil" action, but a special proceeding under 11631 GC.
3. The Supreme Court has held in a number of decisions that actions under that statute are not subject to appeal but only to review on error. (9 App. 419). Appeal therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 324, 1926 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cicchino-v-ferrando-ohioctapp-1926.