Ciccarella v. McCarthy

79 A.D.2d 885, 437 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14323

This text of 79 A.D.2d 885 (Ciccarella v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ciccarella v. McCarthy, 79 A.D.2d 885, 437 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Under the circumstances it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term in vacating the default judgment not to require that the judgment remain as security for any recovery plaintiff might obtain (see Rawson v Austin, 49 AD2d 803). The order is" modified to include such requirement as a condition and plaintiff is stayed from any enforcement of the judgment pending determination of the action. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—■ vacate default judgment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rawson v. Austin
49 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.2d 885, 437 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciccarella-v-mccarthy-nyappdiv-1980.