Ciccarella v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciccarella v. McCarthy

79 A.D.2d 885, 437 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14323

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1980·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Under the circumstances it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term in vacating the default judgment not to require that the judgment remain as security for any recovery plaintiff might obtain (see Rawson v Austin, 49 AD2d 803). The order is" modified to include such requirement as a condition and plaintiff is stayed from any enforcement of the judgment pending determination of the action. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—■ vacate default judgment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Under the circumstances it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term in vacating the default judgment not to require that the judgment remain as security for any recovery plaintiff might obtain (see Rawson v Austin, 49 AD2d 803). The order is" modified to include such requirement as a condition and plaintiff is stayed from any enforcement of the judgment pending determination of the action. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—■ vacate default judgment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.

Ciccarella v. McCarthy, 79 A.D.2d 885, 437 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

79 A.D.2d 885 (Ciccarella v. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related