Ciarletta v. State
54 So. 3d 1039, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 2011 WL 408999
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2011·No. No. 4D10-667·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion. The State, however, concedes that the judgment contains a scrivener’s error. We remand for entry of a [1040]*1040corrected judgment which properly identifies the offense to which appellant pleaded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ciarletta v. State, 54 So. 3d 1039, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 2011 WL 408999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
54 So. 3d 1039 (Ciarletta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc. v. John H. Coddou, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014