Ciarletta v. State
54 So. 3d 1039, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 2011 WL 408999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2011
DocketNo. 4D10-667
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 54 So. 3d 1039 (Ciarletta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ciarletta v. State, 54 So. 3d 1039, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 2011 WL 408999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion. The State, however, concedes that the judgment contains a scrivener’s error. We remand for entry of a [1040]*1040corrected judgment which properly identifies the offense to which appellant pleaded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc. v. John H. Coddou, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 So. 3d 1039, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 2011 WL 408999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciarletta-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.