Ciarleglio v. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Ciarleglio v. Shapiro

253 A.2d 34, 157 Conn. 596

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 10, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.2d 34 (Ciarleglio v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciarleglio v. Shapiro, 253 A.2d 34, 157 Conn. 596 (Colo. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs seek to set aside a decree of adoption, rendered by the Probate Court for the district of Hartford, on the ground that the welfare commissioner failed to comply with the requirements of that portion of what is now General Statutes § 45-63 which requires that he shall, in his report to the Probate Court, “indicate the physical and mental status of the child.” The subordinate facts support the conclusion of the trial court that there was no basis for setting aside the decree.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs seek to set aside a decree of adoption, rendered by the Probate Court for the district of Hartford, on the ground that the welfare commissioner failed to comply with the requirements of that portion of what is now General Statutes § 45-63 which requires that he shall, in his report to the Probate Court, “indicate the physical and mental status of the child.” The subordinate facts support the conclusion of the trial court that there was no basis for setting aside the decree.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.2d 34, 157 Conn. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciarleglio-v-shapiro-conn-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack