Ciardello v. Maxfli

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 16, 1996·No. 96-1130·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



July 16, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-1130

GERALD M. CIARDELLO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MAXFLI, A DIVISION OF DUNLOP/SLAZINGER CORP.,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Gerald M. Ciardello on brief pro se. ___________________
Kevin M. Leach, Arthur G. Greene and McLane, Graf, Raulerson & _______________ _________________ __________________________
Middleton, Professional Association on brief for appellee. ___________________________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and ___________

the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the district court's order of December 19, 1995.

Affirmed. _________

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciardello v. Maxfli, (1st Cir. 1996).

Ciardello v. Maxfli (Ciardello v. Maxfli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.