Ciarcia v. Dager

126 So. 3d 323, 2013 WL 1442247
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2013
DocketNo. 3D12-2565
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 3d 323 (Ciarcia v. Dager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ciarcia v. Dager, 126 So. 3d 323, 2013 WL 1442247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Avisto Mortg., LLC, 110 So.3d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“At the risk of viewing professional courtesy through rose-colored glasses, we can also recall a day when counsel appearing without opposition for a hearing on an obviously-contested matter ... would first place a telephone call to opposing counsel to confirm that some personal emergency or postal glitch had not occurred.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Aristo Mortgage, LLC
110 So. 3d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 3d 323, 2013 WL 1442247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciarcia-v-dager-fladistctapp-2013.