Ciaramella v. Zucker

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 29, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-06945·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED FRANK CIARAMELLA, et al., on behalf of DOC #: themselves and all others similarly situated, DATE FILED:_ 11/29/2021] Plaintiffs, 18-cv-6945 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL HOWARD ZUCKER, as Commissioner of the Department of Health, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court was informed by the Magistrate Judge that the parties reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by December 29, 2021. such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: November 29, 2021 MARY iv viscid New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciaramella v. Zucker, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Ciaramella v. Zucker (Ciaramella v. Zucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)