Ciao Europa, Inc. v. Silver Autumn Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciao Europa, Inc. v. Silver Autumn Hotel Corp.

236 A.D.2d 318, 654 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 318 (Ciao Europa, Inc. v. Silver Autumn Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciao Europa, Inc. v. Silver Autumn Hotel Corp., 236 A.D.2d 318, 654 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered May 2, 1996, which granted plaintiff a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered September 10 and 11, 1996, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable orders.

Injunctive relief was properly granted to preserve the status quo and prevent forfeiture of a valuable leasehold interest upon plaintiff’s showing of the threshold requirements therefor, including its good faith intent and ability to cure the alleged defaults by means short of vacating the premises (see, Continental Towers Garage Corp. v Contowers Assocs. Ltd. ■Partnership, 141 AD2d 390, 394). Defendant’s opposition, which consisted largely of allegations made upon information and belief, was conclusory, or involved defaults so de minimis as to be insufficient to raise a genuine issue concerning plaintiff’s ability to cure. The court also properly deemed defendant’s motions to renew and reargue as motions to reargue (see, Grosso Moving & Packing Co. v Damens, 233 AD2d 128). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered May 2, 1996, which granted plaintiff a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered September 10 and 11, 1996, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable orders.

Injunctive relief was properly granted to preserve the status quo and prevent forfeiture of a valuable leasehold interest upon plaintiff’s showing of the threshold requirements therefor, including its good faith intent and ability to cure the alleged defaults by means short of vacating the premises (see, Continental Towers Garage Corp. v Contowers Assocs. Ltd. ■Partnership, 141 AD2d 390, 394). Defendant’s opposition, which consisted largely of allegations made upon information and belief, was conclusory, or involved defaults so de minimis as to be insufficient to raise a genuine issue concerning plaintiff’s ability to cure. The court also properly deemed defendant’s motions to renew and reargue as motions to reargue (see, Grosso Moving & Packing Co. v Damens, 233 AD2d 128). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 318, 654 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciao-europa-inc-v-silver-autumn-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack