Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cianfrani v. State

Cianfrani v. State

728 So. 2d 323, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 95279
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 1999
DocketNo. 98-00414
StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 323 (Cianfrani v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cianfrani v. State, 728 So. 2d 323, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 95279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Cianfrani appeals his conviction for felony criminal mischief. Because the State failed to present admissible evidence to support the finding that Cianfrani caused over $1,000 in damage, we reverse. See R.A.P. v. State, 575 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The evidence supports a conviction for first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to enter a conviction based upon first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.A.P. v. State
575 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 323, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 95279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cianfrani-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.