Cianfrani v. State
728 So. 2d 323, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 95279
Opinion
James Cianfrani appeals his conviction for felony criminal mischief. Because the State failed to present admissible evidence to support the finding that Cianfrani caused over $1,000 in damage, we reverse. See R.A.P. v. State, 575 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The evidence supports a conviction for first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to enter a conviction based upon first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cianfrani v. State, 728 So. 2d 323, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 95279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
728 So. 2d 323 (Cianfrani v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R.A.P. v. State
575 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)