Cianfarra v. N.C. Department of Transportation

295 S.E.2d 457, 306 N.C. 737, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1554
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1982·No. 177A82·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the rationale and supporting authorities set forth in Judge Clark’s dissent constitute an accurate statement of the law and a correct application of that law to the facts. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and this cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction that it remand to the Superior Court of New Hanover County with an order vacating the judgment of Rouse, J., entered in Superior Court of New Hanover County on 7 April 1981 and ordering that the cause be remanded to the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina for findings as to whether claimant was discharged for misconduct.

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cianfarra v. N.C. Department of Transportation, 295 S.E.2d 457, 306 N.C. 737, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1554 (N.C. 1982).

295 S.E.2d 457 (Cianfarra v. N.C. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm.
353 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
Eason v. Gould, Inc.
311 S.E.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)