Ciancio v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n

210 A.D.2d 9, 618 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11836
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 9 (Ciancio v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ciancio v. Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n, 210 A.D.2d 9, 618 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered on or about June 28, 1993, wMeh granted defendant-appellant’s motion to compel production of certain post-accident hospital records to the limited extent of ordering an in camera inspection of same, and denied defendant-appellant’s request for plaintiff’s post-accident tax returns, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action for personal injuries where plaintiff has alleged, inter alia, a claim for lost earnings, the IAS Court properly granted appellant’s motion to the limited extent of [10]*10ordering an in camera inspection of post-accident hospital records of treatment received by plaintiff for an undisclosed medicad condition which plaintiff maintains is unrelated to the injuries claimed in the action. Appellant has failed to date to show that these records are material and necessary to its defense of plaintiff’s claim for lost earnings (cf., Caplow v Otis El. Co., 176 AD2d 199; see, Iseman v Delmar Med.-Dental Bldg., 113 AD2d 276, 279). The remedy fashioned by the IAS Court is reasonable.

We additionally find proper the IAS Court’s denial of appellant’s request for production of plaintiff’s income tax records for periods after the accident since appellant’s asserted need to verify plaintiff’s disability and claimed lost earnings may be satisfied by resort to alternative sources (see, Berger v Fete Cab Corp., 57 AD2d 784). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palmiero v. 417 E. 9th St. Assoc., LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 8449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Brito v. Gomez
2018 NY Slip Op 8105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Olsen v. James Miller Marine Service, Inc.
6 Misc. 3d 932 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
Justyk v. Treibacher Schleifmittel Corp.
4 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Bordes v. 170 East 106th St. Realty Corp.
260 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.2d 9, 618 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciancio-v-woodlawn-cemetery-assn-nyappdiv-1994.