Ciampa v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciampa v. Hudson

158 A.D.2d 925, 551 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1429

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D.2d 925 (Ciampa v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciampa v. Hudson, 158 A.D.2d 925, 551 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

[926]*926Petitioners’ contention that the Board’s denial of their application was inconsistent with its own precedent concerning similar applications lacks support in the record. The examples of the Board’s past actions submitted by petitioners fail to show "sufficient factual similarity so as to warrant an explanation from the Board” (Knight v Amelkin, 68 NY2d 975, 978). The record also fails to support petitioners’ allegations of impropriety in the Board’s procedures and decision-making process. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[926]*926Petitioners’ contention that the Board’s denial of their application was inconsistent with its own precedent concerning similar applications lacks support in the record. The examples of the Board’s past actions submitted by petitioners fail to show "sufficient factual similarity so as to warrant an explanation from the Board” (Knight v Amelkin, 68 NY2d 975, 978). The record also fails to support petitioners’ allegations of impropriety in the Board’s procedures and decision-making process. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D.2d 925, 551 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciampa-v-hudson-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack