Ciaccio v. James Stewart & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciaccio v. James Stewart & Co.

262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 758 (Ciaccio v. James Stewart & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciaccio v. James Stewart & Co., 262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for damages for personal injuries, the impleaded defendant appeals from an order denying its motion (a) to strike it out as a party to the action, and (b) to dismiss for insufficiency as against it the answer of the original defendant and the cross-complaint set out therein. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The allegations in the cross-complaint consist merely of conjectures based upon redundant and irrelevant matter set out in the complaint. No facts are pleaded in the cross-complaint pointing to the fault or responsibility of the impleaded defendant or its employees. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for damages for personal injuries, the impleaded defendant appeals from an order denying its motion (a) to strike it out as a party to the action, and (b) to dismiss for insufficiency as against it the answer of the original defendant and the cross-complaint set out therein. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The allegations in the cross-complaint consist merely of conjectures based upon redundant and irrelevant matter set out in the complaint. No facts are pleaded in the cross-complaint pointing to the fault or responsibility of the impleaded defendant or its employees. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 758, 27 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciaccio-v-james-stewart-co-nyappdiv-1941.