Ciacci v. United States Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 13, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1643·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MICHAEL K. CIACCI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 12-1643 (ESH) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF EDUCATION et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and

12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Dkt. # 9]. By Order of January 28, 2013,

plaintiff was advised to respond to defendants’ motion by February 28, 2013, or risk dismissal of

the case on what the Court might treat as a conceded motion. Plaintiff has neither filed a

response to the pending motion to dismiss nor sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the

Court will treat the motion as conceded and dismiss the case. See FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58,

68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies wholly with the district court to grant motion to dismiss as

conceded). A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

___________/s/___________ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE DATE: March 13, 2013 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciacci v. United States Department of Education, (D.D.C. 2013).

Ciacci v. United States Department of Education (Ciacci v. United States Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bender
127 F.3d 58 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)