Ciabotti v. Milo

432 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20526
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 1983·No. No. 83-285·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. A disputed claim for money damages does not afford a sufficient basis for the grant of injunctive relief. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2494]; Oxford International Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dism. 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

432 So. 2d 792 (Ciabotti v. Milo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KONOVER REALTY ASSOCIATES v. Mladen
511 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ramos v. STABINSKI & FUNT, PA
494 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Leight v. Berkman
483 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Angora Ent. v. Condo. Ass'n, Lakeside
432 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)