Ciabotti v. Milo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ciabotti v. Milo

432 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20526

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 14, 1983

DocketNo. 83-285

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 432 So. 2d 792 (Ciabotti v. Milo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. A disputed claim for money damages does not afford a sufficient basis for the grant of injunctive relief. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2494]; Oxford International Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dism. 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. A disputed claim for money damages does not afford a sufficient basis for the grant of injunctive relief. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2494]; Oxford International Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dism. 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciabotti-v-milo-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack