Chweya v. Yaroslavsky
36 F. App'x 637
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2002·No. No. 01-55058; D.C. No. CV-00-07150-FMC·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Zev Yaroslavsky, a supervisor for the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, [638] appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based on absolute and qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm because appellant’s contentions are foreclosed by this court’s decisions in Trevino v. Gates, 23 F.3d 1480, 1483 (9th Cir.1994), and Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729, 734 (9th Cir.2001).
Yaroslavsky’s motion to file a supplemental brief is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chweya v. Yaroslavsky, 36 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2002).
36 F. App'x 637 (Chweya v. Yaroslavsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trevino v. Gates
23 F.3d 1480 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Navarro v. Block
250 F.3d 729 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)