Chweya v. Yaroslavsky
This text of 36 F. App'x 637 (Chweya v. Yaroslavsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Zev Yaroslavsky, a supervisor for the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, [638]*638appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based on absolute and qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm because appellant’s contentions are foreclosed by this court’s decisions in Trevino v. Gates, 23 F.3d 1480, 1483 (9th Cir.1994), and Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729, 734 (9th Cir.2001).
Yaroslavsky’s motion to file a supplemental brief is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chweya-v-yaroslavsky-ca9-2002.