Chuttick v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chuttick v. Collins

20 A.D.2d 640, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 640 (Chuttick v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chuttick v. Collins, 20 A.D.2d 640, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an assignee to recover damages for an alleged breach of a lease agreement, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga 'County, dated May 14, 1962 and entered May 28, 1962 in Westchester County, which denied his motion, made pursuant to statute (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 184-a), to change the venue of the action from Westchester County to Onondaga County on the ground that defendant is now and at the time of the commencement of the action was a resident of Onondaga County. Order modified by adding a provision .that the denial of the motion is without prejudice to its renewal in the proper county. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent (see Ludlow Valve Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., 14 A D 2d 291). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an assignee to recover damages for an alleged breach of a lease agreement, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga 'County, dated May 14, 1962 and entered May 28, 1962 in Westchester County, which denied his motion, made pursuant to statute (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 184-a), to change the venue of the action from Westchester County to Onondaga County on the ground that defendant is now and at the time of the commencement of the action was a resident of Onondaga County. Order modified by adding a provision .that the denial of the motion is without prejudice to its renewal in the proper county. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent (see Ludlow Valve Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., 14 A D 2d 291). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 640, 246 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chuttick-v-collins-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack