Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.

289 So. 2d 395, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4451

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 23, 1974·No. No. 44009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed, without prejudice to whatever rights, if any, petitioners may have for tor-tious conspiracy, if any, occurring subsequent to the 1968-69 Jai-Alai season.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed, without prejudice to whatever rights, if any, petitioners may have for tor-tious conspiracy, if any, occurring subsequent to the 1968-69 Jai-Alai season.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.

Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 289 So. 2d 395, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4451 (Fla. 1974).

Pincite

289 So. 2d 395 (Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related