Churchill v. Utica

154 U.S. 550, 14 S. Ct. 1198, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 1007
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 26, 1866
DocketNo. 286
StatusPublished

This text of 154 U.S. 550 (Churchill v. Utica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Churchill v. Utica, 154 U.S. 550, 14 S. Ct. 1198, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 1007 (1866).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Nelson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mr. W. M. Evarts, Mr. C. B. Sedgwick and Messrs. Edmonds & Miller for plaintiff in error. Mr. F. Kernan for defendant in error.

Churchill is the only party against whom judgment was rendered in the court below, and the party who has brought a writ of error to this court.

The judgment is reversed, and the case remitted to the court below for proceedings there as directed in the case of Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573. We refer to the opinion in that case as governing this one. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Allen v. Assessors
70 U.S. 573 (Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 U.S. 550, 14 S. Ct. 1198, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/churchill-v-utica-scotus-1866.