Churchill v. Smith

16 Vt. 560
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedMarch 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Vt. 560 (Churchill v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Churchill v. Smith, 16 Vt. 560 (Vt. 1844).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

The only question presented in this case is, whether the admissions of the wife, made after her intermarriage, are admissible in evidence in a suit brought by the husband. It is sufficient to say, the law is well established that such admissions cannot be received in evidence. When a wife acts as agent for her husband, her admissions, made while she acted as such agent, may be received, — being a part of the res gestes, — but in no other case. The argument is not sound, which has been urged, that, because she cannot be examined under oath as a witness, therefore her declarations, made when she was not under oath, may be given in evidence. The same argument might be urged in favor of receiving the admissions, or declarations, of any one who was dead, or who* from any reason, was rendered incapable of testifying in the case.

The judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weber v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
175 Iowa 358 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
County of Mahaska v. Ingalls
16 Iowa 81 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864)
Steer v. Little
44 N.H. 613 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Vt. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/churchill-v-smith-vt-1844.