Churchill v. Perkins

5 Mass. 541
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

The action stood continued nisi, and at the following March term, at Boston, the opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sewall, J.

It is manifest upon these pleadings, that the plain tiff demands the fruits of an obligation obtained colore officii; and to maintain his action, it must be shown that the demand has arisen in the course of the legal duties, or is justified by some authority of his office; for otherwise it is a means of extortion, and being * against sound policy, is void by the principles of [ * 542 ] the common law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Churchill v. Perkins, 5 Mass. 541 (Mass. 1809).

5 Mass. 541 (Churchill v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watkins v. Minter
180 S.W. 227 (Texas Supreme Court, 1915)
Leona I., M. & C. Co. v. Roberts
62 Tex. 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Jackson v. Siglin
10 Or. 93 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
United States v. Humason
26 F. Cas. 428 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1879)
United States v. Mynderse
27 F. Cas. 53 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York, 1870)
Hawes v. Marchant
11 F. Cas. 870 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1852)
Cadwell v. Colgate
7 Barb. 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Whitsett v. Womack
8 Ala. 466 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Jackson v. Simonton
13 F. Cas. 250 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1832)
Winthrop v. Dockendorff
3 Me. 156 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1824)