Churchill v. JP KING AUCTION COMPANY, INC.
769 N.W.2d 220, 2008 WL 6650997
This text of 769 N.W.2d 220 (Churchill v. JP KING AUCTION COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Churchill v. JP KING AUCTION COMPANY, INC., 769 N.W.2d 220, 2008 WL 6650997 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Lee CHURCHILL and Nancy Churchill, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
J.P. KING AUCTION COMPANY, INC., and Steven L. Reeser, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Royce v. CHATWELL CLUB APARTMENTS
769 N.W.2d 220 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 N.W.2d 220, 2008 WL 6650997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/churchill-v-jp-king-auction-company-inc-mich-2008.