Churchill v. Howard

3 N.C. 335
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

fpHE question here was, whether the defendant, who was •*- executor, could plead judgments obtained against him since [336] tbe last continuance : and the court now decided that the defendant must plead at first the true state of his assets ; otherwise he might delay the plaintiffs until after a bond debt become payable — then suff ;r judgment in that, and bar the present plaintiff by pleading a judgment upon a debt not due till long alter the commencement of the present suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Churchill v. Howard, 3 N.C. 335 (N.C. Ct. App. 1804).

3 N.C. 335 (Churchill v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.