Churchill v. Coyne
Opinion
The action is brought to recover for services rendered by plaintiff as a referee appointed in an action in the Supreme [994]*994Court. . Plaintiff framed his complaint and the case was tried on the theory that he was entitled to recover for the reasonable value of his services. This is error.
The fees of a referee in an action or special proceeding are regulated by section 3296 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and are limited to $10 for each day necessarily spent in the business of the reference, unless a stipulation in excess of that sum is entered into. The stipulation must be in writing and must fix the rate of compensation (N. Y. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 98 App. Div. 285, 90 N. Y. Supp. 710), and in the absence of a stipulation, a referee is only entitled to the fee fixed by statute (Matter of Bieber, 36 Misc. Rep. 341, 73 N. Y. Supp. 552). It is incumbent upon the referee to show that the time spent on the reference was necessarily required. Finkel v. Kohn, 24 Misc. Rep. 368, 53 N. Y. Supp. 694; Matter of Piatti, 26 Misc. Rep. 434, 56 N. Y. Supp. 132.
The judgment should be reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
152 N.Y.S. 993 (Churchill v. Coyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.